Tuesday, November 17, 2009

Stakeholder of The Modern Corporation

The Attack On Managerial Capitalism

The legal argument : management can pursue market transactions with suppliers and customers in an unconstrained manner. But since the corporation is a legal person, exiting in contemplation of the law, managers of the corporation are constrained by law. The changes of legal system giving some rights to those groups that have a claim on the firm, example customers, suppliers, employees, local communities, stockholders and management. The law also has been progressively circumscribing the idea of managerial capitalism that propose interest and benefit should the firm be managed for the stockholder.

The economic argument : Managerial capitalism seek to maximize the interest of stockholders. Management espouses the invisible hand doctrine, therefore do not need intervene of government. But in fact, a lot of externalities, moral hazard, and monopoly power effect by this. Other side we can see many pollution of water and air. It effected by the firm that no one has incentive to incur the cost of clean-up or the cost of non pollution since the marginal gain of one firm’s actions small. Of course those problems can give bad impact for society. So the intervene of government is need as controller and regulator both business and market transactions.

Stakeholders Of The Modern Corporation

Of course we know that corporation have stakeholders , that is , group and individuals who benefit from or are harmed by and whose right are violated or respected by, corporate actions. The narrow definition includes those groups who are vital to the survival and success of the corporation. While the wide definition includes, individual ,any groups and any party also external environment who can effect or effected by the corporation.

In typical corporation we can see many stakeholders of this condition, i.e. owners, suppliers, employees customers, local community, and management.

· Owners have financial stake in the corporation in the corporation in the form of stocks, bonds, and so on, and they expect some kind of financial return from them.

· Suppliers, interpreted in stakeholder sense, are vital to success of the firm, for raw material will determine the final product’s quality and price.

· Employees have their jobs and usually their livelihood at stake, they often have specialized skills for which there is usually no perfectly elastic market.

· Customers exchange resources for the product of the firm and in return receive the benefits of the product.

· Local community grants the firm the right to build facilities and, in turn, benefit from the tax base and economic and social contribution of the firm.

· Management plays a special role in the modern corporation. Management, especially top management , must look after the health of the corporation, and this involves balancing the multiple claims of conflicting stakeholders.

Corporation and stakeholders is related each other. Very important to managing relation with stakeholders. One of the reasons is that managing can effect to the result of corporation like innovation that more success, rate of truth is wider among stakeholders, and the flexibilities of corporation is better. Other reason is the manage influencing performance of corporation.

The simple example, can we see at television channel like “RCTI”, why this channel can be liked. The reason is that channel know how important managing relation with stakeholders that is beholder or audience, celebrities, advertiser, subsidiaries of television station, also common/public group. Else example, when “Nike” want to resolve the condition of work problems at its factory branches, Nike work with many stakeholder like customers, suppliers, government, and compressor group in society.

The conclusion is the corporation or organization are not enough with corporation or organization itself. Corporation have interaction and influenced by its environment include stakeholders. Corporation depend on its environment as input sources, and as customers of its output.

Friday, November 6, 2009

The Fund of Peumakmu Gampong

As we have known, the Government of Aceh with DPRA, Regent And Mayor,since 2009 would allocate the relief fund of Peumakmue Gampong ( BKPG) equal to Rp 1 quintilliun. Fund that have a source from APBA about Rp 100 million and APBK Rp 50 million ,totally almost 1 quintilliun is gave to 6.411 village in Aceh. This Program submitted by the governor of Aceh, Irwandi yusuf at the socialization event of The Financial Aid “Peumakmu Gampong” and The National of Enableness Society ( Self-Supporting- PNPM) in Anjong Mounmata, Pandapa.

BKPG would be managed by the government of village with society that utilized for the activity of village development like economic enableness of society and create employment in countryside and also will be managed transparently, accountable by entangling society participation fully since planning, execution, observation and also responsibility.

But the implementation of this program is not appropriate with its planning. Distribution the relief fund of peumakmu gampong is not run well. One of cause, guide of technical and guide of implementation is different between one regency and the other, even sub district. That difference namely the structure of budget device format for the substance of proposal requirement from each village.

Based to “Gerakan Aceh Anti Korupsi (Gerak)” monitoring , almost certainly the program will be fail, because, the realization of that program is very little, that effected by distribution fund which is impeded. In others side there is some basic problem for implementation of that program. Ie the weakness substance of planning and understanding the Sub district Facilitator that related with participative village planning method, because do not understand about the middle range of village development, like expectation which will be reached in the regulation of Aceh governor, Number 25 at 2009 about Guidance of BPKG management.

Fund of the BPKG program have started the since the beginning year 2009 and the proposal of first phase fund liquefaction have been planned last June. In the reality to date its realization still minim, only just gratuity. Though, time of budget realization to this program only two months again.

Of course, this matter generate concern of various party, inclusive from “Gerakan Aceh Anti Korupsi (Gerak)” and “forum Mintra Gampong (FMG)”. According to me, actually implementation of this program can be respected by related party ,doing by fully responsibility and controlling use of its fund. Irwandi Yusuf as governor have to evaluate performance of “Badan Pemberdayaan Masyarakat (BPM) Aceh and “Dinas Pengelolaan Keuangan dan Kekayaan Aceh (DPKKA)”. That Relief fund can used effectiveness which is really use for the operational of governance and village development, do not allocated or cut to cost of village peripheral. So, the effort of development in accelerate village self-supporting process, seen reality and enjoyed by all of society.